Too many MEP peer reviews measure value by comment count. The result is a spreadsheet of hundreds of redlines flagging typos and keynotes, while the problems that actually cost money go unaddressed—and still surface in the field.
Power Design's award-winning Design Division takes a different approach. Our reviews don't count redlines; they target the strategic decisions that move budgets. We bring seasoned expertise and a contractor's instinct for what it takes to build, going beyond code and coordination to ensure every square foot earns its place—and every detail works for the people who use it.
Plenty of reviewers can mark up a drawing. Few can tell you what a fix will cost or how it gets built. We can, because we see design from every angle: across trades, markets nationwide, and hundreds of projects a year. And the teams that price and build those projects are part of our review process:
The biggest savings live in units, distribution, and building programming. Unit errors multiply. Miss one $150 receptacle in a unit repeated 400 times, and that's $60,000. Distribution and programming decisions scale even further—on one project, correcting overdesigned distribution, risers, and building programming saved $4.5 million on a $17 million electrical budget.
On a luxury hospitality high-rise in Florida, our team reviewed the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing design at 50% and 100% design development. Three catches stood out:
Every one of these costly problems would have surfaced eventually. We made sure it happened on paper—not on the jobsite.
The best time for a peer review is before the design budget is spent. Talk to our team about an MEP peer review while every fix is still a revision.